A Law or Treaty for Medical Freedom and Decentralized Healthcare, Including the Approach to Diseases of Concern
Grounded in Real Science, Bioethics, and the Principles of Natural Rights
If you agree with this proposal of law, you can support it using the comments section below. Cross-post it to your audience.
Join Us in Supporting This Law
We, the people and countries adopting this law or treaty, follow these ten principles:
Whenever a new set of concerning signs and symptoms “appears”, we will investigate the causes, being open to all possibilities, which include not only viruses, bacteria, fungi, or any living organism but also other chemical and physical causes such as toxins, environmental contamination, and radiation poisoning or interference, among other hypotheses, and even a combination of them. The debate about the possible causes will always and forever remain open to questioning. The origin of the disease, whether spontaneous or planned, will also be subject to open debate.
The diagnosis of any disease of concern1 will never be made only by indirect inference by any test. It will always be established considering the severity of the signs and symptoms of each individual. Stratification and categorization based on the severity of the clinical presentation and risk factors for complications, including lifestyle and nutrition, will always be necessary and informed to the public. The validity and legitimacy of any diagnostic method will always be open to debate and can be questioned at any time.
The duty of the WHO and any other medical or healthcare official institution is to inform about the emergence of a new disease of concern, its possible causes and the availability of diagnostic methods and to promote the open scientific and professional debate of competing points of view about causes and diagnostic methods. This includes combating any censorship of any kind in any media. Doctors, professionals and scientists around the world expressing different ideas and opinions will be encouraged to speak and expose their views.
Medical or healthcare official institutions recognize that only free debate of different and competing opinions can provide an environment of informed decision-making in each country, state, county, community and by families and individuals. As more free debate and free expression of ideas, facts and data occur, more each society will be able to decide for itself the best interventions to recommend for the control and management of the new disease of concern. Suppression of free professional or public debate in the media or in any other way is forbidden by this treaty.
Referenced on the worldwide free debate and using their professional clinical rationale, doctors will always be allowed to use preventive and treatment interventions they consider the best for each patient under their assistance at the office or hospital. This may include strategies with safety records such as lifestyle changes, food as medicine, vitamins, minerals, safe natural supplements and repurposed drugs approved for other diseases. Suspension of any of those optional strategies chosen by doctors will not be allowed; if safety concerns about any strategy arise supported by randomized clinical trials, this information must become part of the public debate.
Pharmaceutical industries are encouraged to develop, perform clinical trials and offer their own products for prevention or treatment of the new disease of concern. Those products, however, will also be exposed to continuous free, open and competing professional debate about their adequacy, efficacy and safety. These products will never be mandated in any circumstance. Liability about harms the pharmaceutical products may cause cannot be suppressed by any legislation or contractual clause. All the data produced by those clinical trials must be available publicly and immediately.
Neither the WHO, governments or governmental agencies, nor medical groups, less so the media will promote these or other interventions or products as obligatory means to contain the disease of concern. Institutions involved in the health debate may only recommend strategies, including behaviors, restrictions or interventions, such as lockdown or masks, but never impose any of them or mandate any of them upon societies, families, business and individuals. Above everything, such institutions have the duty to promote and publicize the open debate of competing ideas, which requires their committees of specialists to be composed by and hear professionals with different views.
Each family, individual or patient will always retain the right to accept or refuse any intervention recommended by any institution, be it governments, medical associations, the WHO or any other else. Promotion of the public debate of competing points of view and access of the population to that debate, plus the personal dialogue between patients and doctors, will ensure each individual and family to be sufficiently informed to make their own choices and decisions regarding their health, under the principle of informed consent. No uniform behavior of all the society will be required and the autonomy and will of each individual as citizen and patient are protected by this treaty.
The media, the press and all main internet platforms are asked to refrain the impulse for inflicting terror and fear on the population or showing spectacular or dramatic images and stories about the emerging disease and, the other way, they are encouraged to stay balanced, giving voices to different analyses and opinions always. It is forbidden by this treaty to manipulate search or feed algorithms in favor of one view and censor or shadow ban any different opinion by any pretext. The responsibility of the media is to humbly foster the public debate of competing ideas for the people to decide which one is further from the truth and should be ignored.
In dealing with any new disease of concern, decentralized clinical rationale by doctors and informed consent of patients will always be above any political interests or centralized decision by any government or health agency. The sovereignty of the doctor-patient relationship will always be respected as well as the sovereignty of each individual regarding interventions related to his/her own health. No imposition whatsoever can be applied upon the population by the countries that adopt this law or sign this treaty.
Signing Here the People and Countries (support using the comments below):
Disclaimer: This is a suggested law or treaty for countries to adopt or sign. Comment below to show your support.
This concept of disease of concern, here, includes pandemic diseases. The WHO recently attempted to differentiate these concepts for whatever reason they may imagine, but here in this suggestion they could be understood as the same.
I have included this in my post about the G20 decision to support international vaccine passports today. Thank you. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/g20-bali-baloney
This is great. I support this type of initiative. Not sure it will matter to any of the NPCs in power, but it's an excellent tool for spreading awareness and the potential for nonviolent resistance to medical tyranny and health fascism among We the People ...